In his ornate statements, the homebody made a mistake in the dating community in contact
[h3][i]As for dating through the VK social network communities, there are just a lot of branches for dating types. If you try hard, you can even find communities dedicated to meeting necrophiles and necrophiles in contact. Although, given the object of necrophilia's lust, it's kind of strange to hope that the dead will start writing to subscribers and subscribers of these communities.[/i][/h3]
But now we're talking about something else – something more mundane about dating necrophiles, but strange about standard "dating" communities. This refers to dating for stay-at-home people. These stay-at-home people prefer to call themselves by words like "hikka", "hikki", "hikkan", "owl" and "hikikomori". These same "hikkans" are individuals with a rich mental world, but poor communication skills, who, despite their sociophobic and unpleasant attitude towards society, still want to find an interlocutor or an interlocutor with a possible future love on the Internet.
[b][i]As is customary in "acquaintance" communities, even in the ordinary format, where individuals do not have rich mental content, questionnaires there very often have a narrative style characterized by the word "floridity". This means the following: the use of unnecessary and often even made-up facts and meaningless phrases in the questionnaire, which are just a desire to tell about your personality in colors, even if water is used instead of colors in the metaphysical sense.[/i][/b]
One of the guests of the "acquaintance" community in contact for stay-at-home people in the variety of suggestions from the questionnaire regarding his personality decided to use a fatal verbal turn. This person typed: "I have an undisguised love of nature." The fatality of this verbal turn is expressed in the fact that such an ornate "water" can be discredited from beginning to end.
What is meant here? The fact is that the phrase "undisguised love" makes sense to be used only when it implies lust for something forbidden or censured by the public - for example, love for homosexual ideas. It is not forbidden by society to love nature (plants and small animals), as a result of which it is incorrect to inform people from the "familiar" community that one's love for nature is undisguised, because what exactly can one hide in terms of love by expressing love for nature? That's the thing, it's nothing.
However, such a seemingly mundane question raises new questions. For example, nature is divided into living (conscious) and inanimate when plants are meant. And wildlife includes many species of creatures: mammals, birds, insects and, of course, humans. This includes people of any gender, age, and sexual orientation.
That is, when an ornately thinking homebody with a wealth of mental baggage tells that he has an undisguised love of nature, then such a person should understand that nature is not only plants and unintelligent animals, it is also an animal called "homo sapiens", and this animal may have an unconventional sexual orientation. or too young / old age, which is why the owner of an undisguised love of nature can, according to verbal logic, be attributed even to homosexuals who are condemned by society, even to pedophiles greedy for kids, even to gerontophiles aroused by old bodies. And what? Everything is natural, because children, homosexuals, and grandparents are all living things together.
[b][i]In addition, a potential lover of everything and everything, in addition to plants and cute cats with dogs, should henceforth clarify exactly how this person expresses his love for nature, as well as such a loving individual will have to expand on what he generally understands by the word "love" and into which categories this person divides his love, and then the floridness of the text of this "familiar" homebody can turn against him.
[/i][/b] 1xbet รหัสโปรโมชั่น
